Eliot at 40, puzzling over poetry, parrots and people

 
p38 books
3 January 2013

The Letters of T S Eliot: Volume 4: 1928-1929
edited by Valerie Eliot and John Haffenden
(Faber, £40)

Here we have proof positive that T S Eliot was surely the hardest working man of letters there has ever been.

This 826-page volume collects Eliot’s letters, from just 1928 and 1929, years when he himself turned 40. Though there are often multiple letters from a single day, even so this huge book doesn’t contain his complete correspondence from the time, significant letters to his brother and mother having been burned by Eliot.

In this period, Eliot, as well as producing much important writing himself — including the essay collection For Lancelot Andrews, his study of Dante, and poems that became part of Ash Wednesday — edited and administrated on an heroic scale.

To maintain publication of his ambitious and influential magazine, The Criterion, suddenly deprived of the financial support of Lady Rothermere, he needed to court new backers and subscribers as well as contributors. At the same time, he helped to establish and reorganise the new publishing house of which he was a director as Faber & Faber.

Towards the end of this period, Eliot observes to his brother Henry that he nonetheless still has to supplement his income “by reviewing, articles, prefaces, lectures, broadcasting talks, and anything that turns up … I have begun life three times: at 22, 28, and again at 40; I hope I shall not have to do so again, because I am growing tired”. Read this book right through and you can understand why.

Meanwhile, Eliot also continued to care for his unhappy, fractious wife Vivien — “mad as a hare”, in Virginia Woolf’s view — with “anxious fortitude”, as the editor John Haffenden judiciously puts it. A few of her letters pop up among the flow of Eliot’s careful considerations, lively and emotional but also off-the-wall barmy.

To Ottoline Morrell, she writes from her French sanatorium: “I am very miserable, & it is all quite useless. You must have gathered from Tom what a horrible mess all this is. But as you can see, he simply hates the sight of me. And I don’t know what to do.” A month later, she apologises to Morrell for having spoken against her husband, before adding: “If you hear of me being murdered, don’t be surprised!” Back in London later that year, she writes to another tolerant friend, Mary Hutchinson: “I had a horrible affair at a hair-dresser’s last Monday week & I very nearly died.” (Eliot himself eschewed expressive italicisation in his letters.)

It is Eliot’s sheer energy and commitment that impresses the most, as he solicits writers across Europe, participates in debate, supplies references and introductions, arranges meetings, agrees terms, and soothes contributors, always returning unwanted submissions courteously and offering helpful advice. He frequently has to apologise for being in arrears, but he never gives up, always answers.

It can’t be said that such administrative excellence makes for non-stop excitement. But, formally phrased and remotely delivered though most of these letters are, they nonetheless still contain many treasurable sayings, all the more cutting for being coolly expressed.

Puzzling over the very existence of “persons for whom religion is wholly unnecessary”, he says: “They may be very good, or very happy; they simply seem to miss nothing, to be unconscious of any void — the void that I find in the middle of all human happiness and all human relations, and which there is only one thing to fill …”

He is equally definite, and often very funny too, on literary questions. “One always loses money by publishing books which concern only those readers who like to think,” he observes, apparently mildly.

To one of the younger poets imitating his own work (all dealt with gently), whom he found lacking in rhythm, he writes: “I don’t know whether it could be any use to you, but I have found myself that it is a great assistance to me to correct my verses by reciting them aloud to myself with the accompaniment of a small drum.”

He writes winningly too about such subjects as parrots (a brilliant one in a pub in Angel), the Morris Minor (“a very small car, a minimal car”), and the appeal of this city: “London is very large, and there are some very intelligent people in it.”

The editing and annotation of these letters is at the level that the subject deserves — there can be no higher praise. John Haffenden supplies all the context needed in generous footnotes with few slips detectable (the Journals of Stephen Spender were not edited by Jane Sutherland).

Among the younger writers perceptively encouraged by Eliot was W H Auden. After Eliot’s death, Auden testified to Eliot’s influence on his generation: “He taught us that a poet’s conduct is subject to exactly the same moral judgments as that of a person in any other walk of life… So long as one was in Eliot’s presence, one felt it was impossible to say or do anything base.” This volume, the first genuine literary event of the New Year, shows why, irresistibly.

Go to standard.co.uk/booksdirect to buy this book for £32, or phone 0843 060 0029, free UK p&p

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in