A gamble that doesn't pay off

High stakes: Huck Cheever (Eric Bana) steals money from Billie Offer (Drew Barrymore) to fund his poker habit
10 April 2012

Curtis Hanson, as L.A. Confidential will vouchsafe, is a highly competent film-maker.

But he has bitten off rather more than he can comfortably chew with screenwriter Eric Roth's poker story, in which long stretches of professional poker are played out before us in a manner which only card fiends will readily comprehend. There are, as the popularity of online gaming shows, plenty of those. But it doesn't seem likely that the rest of us will be gripped.

Hanson frames the sessions with a passable if slightly clichéd story. Eric Bana, a decent actor if not quite a real star yet, is aspiring player Huck Cheever, the son of a poker legend (Robert Duvall). Huck is good at the vital business of reading opponents but lets his emotions get the better of him on occasions and never stops when he's winning.

Away from the tables, his life is a mess until he meets young singer Billie Offer (Drew Barrymore). And even then, he steals some money from her, hoping to give it back from his winnings. She's furious, having been warned about him by her sister - but she can't help herself: she's in love.

Meanwhile, Huck and his father have an awkward relationship, possibly because of some imagined slight in Huck's youth but probably because Dad knows exactly what makes his son an inferior player to himself.

With all this as background, the poker games proliferate, and while it is intriguing to see the psychology involved among the players, and to watch a veteran such as Duvall doing his excellent shtick, it's a bit of a strain trying to follow what's happening with the cards.

Eric Roth's screenplay is supersmart but sometimes overbearingly so. Hanson's direction is almost as smooth and totally confident that we'll all be hooked on his subject matter. There's also a cameo from Robert Downey Jr as an amateur psychologist that's amusing if improbable, and a golf match for high stakes that takes us away from the tables for a bit.

But Lucky You would be distinctly better if it were shorter in length and clearer about the rules of the game. Its idea that gamblers carry on much the same in life as they do at the tables is hardly original enough to sustain the whole film.

Lucky You
Cert: PG

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in