Ruling would have cut Paul McCartney payout

Terry Kirby12 April 2012

Today's ruling would potentially have transformed the outcome of several previous divorce cases if the couples had signed a pre-nup.

The most striking example is Sir Paul McCartney's settlement with Heather Mills, which gave her and their daughter Beatrice an overall payment of £24.3 million.

Sir Paul had reportedly rejected a pre-nuptial agreement as unromantic. But legal experts suggested that if had signed one, Ms Mills would have received a fraction of the money.

Although she would have still received a significant sum to pay for the upbringing of her daughter, any pre-nup designed to protect Sir Paul's wealth from before they married would almost certainly have been accepted by the court.

Impact on pre-nups in other cases, such as that of the Arsenal footballer Ray Parlour — whose wife Karen won a third of his future earnings after a Court of Appeal ruling in 2004 — is likely to be less, however, when the couple's wealth is established primarily after their marriage.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in