Schools 'should select pupils by lottery'

Places at the most popular schools should be distributed by lottery, according to a think tank.

The proposal, from the Left-of-centre Social Market Foundation (SMF), is the most radical solution yet to the nightmare faced by thousands of parents in London. It suggests they should be able to apply for a place at any school, unrestricted by catchment areas.

If a school was oversubscribed, it said, places should be allocated by drawing names out of a hat, ending the trend of well-off families moving close to sought-after schools to ensure their child gains a place.

A recent study concluded that homes near good state schools sell for up to a third more than their market value. While parents already living close to a school would not be guaranteed a place under the "lucky-dip" system, they would also be spared the agony of losing out because a catchment area was drawn only yards from their front door.

The proposal is due to be published on Wednesday, on the eve of a report on school admissions by the powerful House of Commons

education select committee.

MPs are expected to savage the present admissions system.

With the most popular schools oversubscribed by up to 10 times, parental choice in the capital and other areas is more myth than reality, the report will conclude.

In fact, far from parents choosing schools, many church and former grant-maintained schools are actually picking the pupils they think will achieve the best exam results.

SMF director Philip Collins said allocating places by lottery would be "undeniably fair".

"There would be objections from middle-class families who succeed in getting places in the best state schools because they can afford to buy houses in the catchment area," he said.

"But it would mean that poorer parents would stand a better chance of getting places in good schools."

The education select committee's report is also expected to:

  • Argue for the re-introduction of "banding" as a means of ensuring a better mixture of ability across all schools, with each required to admit set proportions of children from each ability band.
  • Criticise the Government for extending selection by aptitude and call for further research on the difference between aptitude and ability.
  • Call for a review of the rule on siblings. At present brothers and sisters of pupils are also entitled to a place, even if the family has moved elsewhere in the meantime.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in