The case for and against

12 April 2012
For:

? It will enable managers to spot when problems are beginning to arise. Bristol highlighted a situation in which a surgeon's mistakes or incompetence were often spotted too late.

? A national overview of success rates for different operations will emerge, allowing hospitals to compare themselves with each other, and enabling patients to see exactly what standard of service they are getting from their local hospital.

Against:

? Data collection has been very scrappy in the past. The BMA is working with the Department of Health to improve the process, but that may mean consultants having to do a lot more paperwork to ensure the statistics mean something.

? Crude death rates don't take into account important variations, such as the fact that some surgeons and hospitals operate on much higher-risk cases than others.

? It could destroy team morale. Surgeons do not act alone but are supported by highlyskilled teams of anaesthetists, nurses and technicians who all need to work closely together.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in