Family of London rioter who died in prison after stealing gingerbread man sue NHS Trust

James Best, 37, was awaiting sentence in Wandsworth Prison in September 2011 when he suffered a heart attack
Chaos: file picture shows Croydon during the riots
Getty
Rachel Blundy30 November 2015
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

The family of a man who died in custody after stealing a gingerbread man from a bakery during the London riots is suing an NHS Trust and the London Ambulance Service over alleged failings in his care.

James Best, 37, was awaiting sentence in Wandsworth Prison in September 2011 when he suffered a heart attack and later died.

His foster mother and brother, Dolly and Owen Daniel, have launched a High Court claim over his death, which they insist could have been prevented.

They claim the nurse who discovered Mr Best in cardiac arrest waited an unnecessary length of time before calling an ambulance.

They also allege he faced an unreasonable delay before an ambulance arrived.

St Georges Healthcare NHS Trust and the London Ambulance Service are accused of breaching their duties to protect Mr Best's right to life.

Medical professionals are said to have breached a European convention which says that nobody should be subject to "inhuman or degrading treatment".

Counsel Kirsten Sjovoll told Mrs Justice Lang in London there was an unreasonable delay by the nurse on call in requesting an ambulance when she arrived at Mr Best's cell - despite it being apparent that there was a real and immediate risk to his life.

It should have been summoned within one to two minutes - while the defence view was that five or so minutes was reasonable for her to carry out assessment.

There was also an alleged failure - both in the system and individually - to dispatch an ambulance without unnecessary or unreasonable delay once the 999 call was received.

Ms Sjovoll said: "We are talking about a cardiac arrest. Seconds count and minutes matter.

"We are talking about medically-trained professionals who knew or ought to have known that this was a life-threatening situation and should have acted quicker to do something about it - that is call 999."

She added it would have been a "very distressing" way for Mr Best, who was vulnerable due to his mental and physical health problems, to die.

It was not disputed that it could not be shown on the balance of probabilities that Mr Best would have survived but for the alleged failings.

It was not a negligence action - and all that needed to be shown was that Mr Best lost a "real" or "substantial" chance of a different outcome, said counsel.

Mrs Daniel, who fostered Mr Best when he was 15, wept as she gave evidence.

She said that the principle aim of the claim was not damages but an apology for the "shortcomings" identified at his inquest in March 2013.

"We think that James deserved the respect and dignity after his death that he certainly was not accorded in the manner of his dying."

Mrs Daniel, who worked as a complaints manager with the NHS for a decade, added: "I did a lot of work with bereaved families and I tried to treat them a lot better than we've been treated."

The trial, which is only concerned with the contested issue of liability, is expected to last five days with a decision reserved to a later date.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in