Jeremy Bamber seeking 'hidden' evidence to help overturn White House Farm murder convictions

Jeremy Bamber
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

Convicted killer Jeremy Bamber claims there is fresh evidence that will help overturn his convictions for murdering five members of his own family, the High Court has heard.

The 59-year-old is serving a whole life sentence for the murders of his adoptive parents Nevill and June, both 61, his sister Sheila Caffell, 26, and her six-year-old twins Daniel and Nicholas at White House Farm, Essex, in August 1985.

Bamber has always maintained his innocence, throughout his trial and for years after sentencing, arguing Ms Caffell shot her relatives before turning the gun on herself.

Today the High Court heard Bamber argued that the Crown Prosecution Service did not disclose material about a second firearm silencer allegedly found at White House Farm.

Bamber insists that evidence would “significantly undermine the prosecution case” and would have played a “crucial” role in his defence.

“The prosecution case at trial was based exclusively on the point that there was only ever one sound moderator and that the specific factual circumstances in which this sound moderator was found and the nature of the blood grouping on it meant that Sheila Caffell could not have committed the murders and then taken her life”, said his barrister, Joe Stone QC.

“The issue of a second sound moderator is therefore crucial.

“If there was one then the jury would have unable to correctly evaluate this critical dimension of the case - namely the exact circumstances in which Sheila Caffell died - where the second sound moderator was located and the relevant inferences that could have been drawn from that to rebut this dimension of the prosecution case.”

Mr Stone told a hearing this morning that “it now seems almost certain that there is a second sound moderator”, seeking a ruling that would move Bamber’s bid to overturn his convictions a step further.

At Bamber’s trial in 1986, the prosecution argued that Ms Caffell could not have reached the trigger to kill herself if the silencer was attached to the murder weapon.

Mr Stone argued Bamber’s latest attempt to challenge the convictions through the Criminal Cases Review Commission would be “significantly handicapped” without the CPS evidence he says exists, and denied that this was a “speculative fishing exercise”.

At his trial, jurors heard how Bamber stood to receive a large inheritance after the murders and had placed the gun in the hands of his sister – who suffered from schizophrenia – to make it look like a murder-suicide.

At today’s hearing, Bamber hit out at the original officer in the case, claiming he had provided “sensitive” material in the case to author Carol Ann Lee, who was behind the recent TV drama White House Farm with actor Freddie Fox taking the role of the killer.

He claims the officer has since destroyed case material despite knowing there is an ongoing appeal.

In a written submission, CPS lawyer Annabel Darlow QC said: “The alleged existence of two sound moderators, and the integrity of the exhibits relating to the examination of the sound moderator, have been the subject of exhaustive inquiry and review.”

She said the CPS “does not accept that the documents now sought were not previously disclosed or made available to the claimant”.

Ms Darlow added: “The relevant evidence at trial was the existence of one sound moderator, contaminated with deposits explicable only on the basis that it was attached to the firearm used for the murders.

“Even if, contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence, the existence of a second sound moderator was established, it would not displace those scientific findings.”

She added that the CCRC had previously “looked extremely extensively at the issue of whether or not there was a second sound moderator” and said Bamber was “tribunal shopping to avoid going back to the CCRC”.

The judge is expected to rule on the application next week.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in