Sisters disunite as we’re not all feminists now at Oxford

 
15 February 2013

The Oxford Union last night held a lively debate on the motion “this house believes we are all feminists now” to mark 50 years since women were admitted as members of the student society. Opposing the motion were Rachel Johnson, Edwina Currie, Green Party leader Natalie Bennett and New Statesman writer Laurie Penny — and proceedings did not remain wholly sisterly.

St Anne’s PPE graduate Currie declared she was “definitely not a feminist”, seeing feminism as “barren and humourless”. Penny summed up with her own vision of feminism — “I couldn’t give a damn about boardrooms: get all men and all women out of boardrooms and set fire to them” — before she turned on her own side in a magnificent switcheroo attacking Currie’s “disgusting sentiments” and asking the audience, to support the motion after all.

She got a standing ovation but her pleas were in vain. The house rejected the motion, proposed by Michael Beloff (who was president when women were admitted to the Union in 1963) by 167 votes to 125.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in

MORE ABOUT