EU referendum: Priti Patel says PM ‘doesn’t need to face Boris and Gove on TV’

Conciliatory: leading Brexiteer Priti Patel
Roland Hoskins
Joseph Watts10 June 2016
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

Top Brexiteer Priti Patel today broke ranks by saying it is unnecessary for David Cameron to go head-to-head in a live EU debate with rivals Boris Johnson and Michael Gove.

Despite fellow Leave campaigners trying to push the Prime Minister into facing them, employment minister Ms Patel said there were already enough TV debates. Her words come days after Mr Johnson and Mr Gove demanded a “face-to-face” TV clash with Mr Cameron, arguing it was what “the public deserve”.

In a further conciliatory move towards Downing Street, Ms Patel made clear she was not targeting Mr Cameron or George Osborne when claiming leading Remainers are too rich to care about the EU’s impact on the poor.

She told the Standard she believed Mr Cameron would make “appropriate” choices in any post- referendum reshuffle and indicated a desire to stay on the frontbench.

On Tuesday Mr Johnson and Mr Gove challenged the Prime Minister to a “face-to-face” debate, which he has steadfastly refused to do. But Ms Patel said: “We have all been campaigning now for weeks and weeks and I think both sides are articulating their point.I don’t actually think this is about getting up on platforms x platforms or y.”

Arguments between Conservative MPs are increasingly bitter, but Ms Patel sought to play down divisions.

She herself was accused of attacking the Prime Minister and Chancellor when she said well-off Remainers did not care about others, but she said she was actually referring to “a lot of wealthy individuals out there, who have been making these comments and they are the ones that benefit from immigration and cheaper labour.”

She dismissed a joke about her first name by a union chief who called it “a contradiction”, and said people who “go down to that level” have lost the argument.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in

MORE ABOUT