Road signs ruled ‘confusing’ after costing motorists £5 million in fines

 
Emer Martin20 July 2012

The floodgates have opened for drivers disputing fines over notorious road signs in north London branded “the most confusing in Britain.”

Motorists have paid more than £5 million for being caught out by an array of nine traffic signs in Grafton Road, Kentish Town, installed in 2006.

But an appeal against a fine this week which claimed the signs can be understood to mean the opposite of what is intended was upheld by the Parking and Traffic Appeals Service (PATAS).

This has prompted calls for the cash taken from all drivers stung in Grafton Road over the years to be reimbursed by Camden council.

Driver Tim Cole, 44, who lodged the appeal after he was fined twice in March, said it should be treated as a “landmark ruling”.

The landscape architect, from Hastings, added: “The signs have to be the most confusing in Britain. The decision by the adjudicator demonstrates without a doubt that the motorists are being trapped and the signs should be taken down and the money returned.”

PATAS adjudicator, Anthony Chan ruled that the “signage was inadequately clear” and revealed a problem “that has not really been addressed by the authority, if at all”.

But Camden council claims it has done nothing wrong and is challenging the decision which it believes to be “flawed”.

Councillor Phil Jones, cabinet member for sustainability, said: “The signage is fully compliant with the regulations in place, and it is our view that when considering the appeal the adjudicator for PATAS has misinterpreted the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions.

 “We will be seeking a review of the adjudicator’s decision in this case as we believe that his interpretation is flawed.”

The council has also stressed that that the adjudicator’s decision only applied to that specific incident.

A spokesman from the council said: “PATAS can only rule on the parking ticket appealed. A decision on one day does not create a precedent for the next.

“With this case the entire appeal rested on whether the sign on the road should state when you can or when you cannot drive along it. At the moment it says when you can, the adjudicator said it should state when you can’t.”

A total of 41,000 motorists were fined in the five years after the signage was installed as a measure to control rush-hour traffic.

Alex Henney, of the National Motorists Action Group (NMAG), called for an independent investigation into Cam¬den’s parking operation and “disregard for law, transparency and fairness”.

He said: “The decision by Camden Council to ‘disregard’ the PATAS adjudicator’s ruling shows a total lack of respect for the appeals process. It is clear that Camden Council has used the misleading and unlawful Grafton Road signage as a cash-cow for years.”

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in

MORE ABOUT