Daniel Morgan: Dame Cressida Dick has ‘no intention of resigning’ over Met Police ‘institutional corruption’ claims

Dame Cressida Dick hit back at findings from a damning report.
Daniel Morgan
PA Media

Dame Cressida Dick has “no intention of resigning” over Met Police “institutional corruption” claims as she faced down accusations.

The Met chief dismissed calls to resign after the publication of a damning report on the unsolved 1987 murder of private investigator Mr Morgan, insisting she did not obstruct the work of an independent panel looking at the case.

It comes after the panel, led by Baroness Nuala O’Loan, found the force had put protecting its own reputation above finding Mr Morgan’s killer.

But Dame Dick told reporters on Wednesday that she did not believe her force was institutionally corrupt.

“I have the deepest feelings for Daniel Morgan’s family. They have shown extraordinary grit and determination and courage,” she added.

She went on to say: “Yesterday, I apologised again to them for our failings and the fact that we have not brought anybody to justice despite six investigations and countless other reviews and pieces of work.

“And for the fact that, in so doing and along the way, we have clearly, we the Met, my force of which I’m very proud to be the Commissioner, we have caused them extra anguish.

“But I don’t accept that we are institutionally corrupt, no.”

The panel’s report said that concealing or denying failings, for the sake of the organisation’s public image, is dishonesty on the part of the organisation for reputational benefit and constitutes a form of institutional corruption.

The Met admitted in 2011 that the grossly inadequate first investigation into Mr Morgan’s murder – which saw the murder scene left unsearched and unguarded – had been hampered by corruption.

But the panel found that corruption had gone on after the initial inquiry and questioned why no action had been taken to bring those who sabotaged the first investigation to justice.

Dame Cressida was criticised in the 1,200-page document for having initially denied the panel access to the police HOLMES database as it investigated the case, but she has insisted the force had given the panel team “maximum co-operation”.

During her interview with reporters, she added “I didn’t obstruct their work. I set out with my team, who were well resourced, to ensure that we gave the panel maximum co-operation, and that we did full disclosure, as quickly as we could.

“I look back and know that I acted with integrity, and that I was at all times trying to fulfil my duty there to the family and to the panel.

Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Dick
PA Wire

“Having said that, I look back and think that in the Met, with this very difficult and powerful report landing, we should of course, together with the Home Office and others, look at what happened during that period, and see whether there are any lessons to be learned for any future possible similar panel.

“Because we would want, of course, to work as effectively as possible with them and have as good communication as possible with them.

“But I have no intention of resigning.”

A string of police investigations and an inquest have failed to convict anyone of the killing or any associated corruption in protecting those responsible.

The numerous inquiries into the case have largely been due to the campaigning efforts of Mr Morgan’s brother Alastair who has fought for justice for more than 30 years.

He described the findings as an “historic result” but expressed regret that his mother Isobel Hulsmann, who died in 2017, did not live to see the report’s publication, something that he blames on the Met.

In the wake of the report’s findings, he said the Met commissioner should “absolutely” be considering her position.

But Dame Cressida said it is her job to focus on leading the Met through “what has been in the last 15 months, for all sorts of reasons, some pretty challenging times”.

She added: “My people do very difficult work, they have to make very difficult decisions, often with far too little time, sometimes with far too little information.

“I’m very proud of them. I love my job and I will continue to do it.

“I’m an honourable person. If I thought I should be considering my position I would be, but I don’t.”

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in