Jude Law among lead hacking cases

Jude Law's claim will be one of the lead cases in the News of the World phone-hacking litigation
12 April 2012

Actor Jude Law's claim has been named as one of the lead cases in the News of the World phone-hacking litigation.

The other selected cases, which are due to be tried by Mr Justice Vos at the High Court in January next year, are agent Sky Andrew, interior designer Kelly Hoppen, football commentator Andy Gray and MP Chris Bryant.

The judge said the cases would enable him to decide the damages that were properly payable across a range of alleged factual situations, and make it possible for other cases to be resolved without the need for further hearings.

He added that the trial would cover the issues of "what was agreed to be done, by whom, for what purpose, over what period and who was involved".

The action arises out of the disclosure of information by the Metropolitan Police and Vodafone relating to material forfeited by private detective Glenn Mulcaire who, with News of the World reporter Clive Goodman, was jailed over royal phone taps in 2007.

The judge also named a second tier of claims, which will move up should any of the lead cases settle - as has happened with actress Sienna Miller's action, although it has yet to be formalised through a statement in open court.

They are those of former MP George Galloway, footballer Paul Gascoigne, actor Steve Coogan, PR consultant Max Clifford's former assistant Nicola Phillips, and model Elle Macpherson's former adviser Mary-Ellen Field.

The judge said Mr Andrew's case was chosen as he was admitted in the criminal prosecution to have been the subject of interception, and was an example of someone about whom no article was published but who attracted interest because of the people he acted for.

Kelly Hoppen was significant because she was said to have been targeted over a lengthy period up until 2009, was the subject of 11 articles and was allegedly harassed.

The judge said Mr Gray's case was useful because it was admitted there was an article written about him as a result of a message he left, so the court would not have to determine whether material was obtained by normal journalistic methods, as it might have to do in Ms Hoppen's case.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in