Meta fined for second time by watchdog for enforcement order breaches

The fine relates to enforcement orders linked to the Competition and Markets Authority’s investigation into Meta’s proposed takeover of Giphy.
Meta has been fined for a second time by the Competition and Markets Authority (Brian Lawless/PA)
PA Wire
Martyn Landi4 February 2022

Facebook’s parent company Meta has been fined for a second time by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) for breaching an initial enforcement order from the watchdog.

The CMA said it had fined Meta £1.5 million after it failed to alert the regulator in advance of key staff leaving the company while an investigation into a merger is taking place.

The CMA launched an investigation into Meta’s proposed purchase of GIF-sharing platform Giphy in June 2020.

The technology giant said it was “disappointed” by the decision and called the fine “problematic” because it said it related to the “voluntary departure of US-based employees”.

Breaches like this one threaten our ability to maintain the benefits of competition for people using these products and services

Joel Bamford, Competition and Markets Authority

It is standard practice for the CMA to issue an initial enforcement order at the start of an investigation into a completed merger as they are designed to make sure the companies involved continue to compete with one another as they would have before the deal took place, and also prevents the companies from integrating further while a merger review is under way.

It is the second time Meta has been fined for breaching an initial enforcement order – in October 2021, the tech giant was fined more than £50 million by the CMA for significantly limiting the scope of compliance reports which were a part of the watchdog’s investigation into the Giphy purchase.

The CMA has since ruled that Meta’s purchase of Giphy could harm social media users and UK advertisers, and has told Meta to sell Giphy in its entirety.

Explaining the latest fine, Joel Bamford, senior director of mergers at the CMA, said: “Meta failed to alert us in advance to important changes in their staff, despite knowing they were legally required to do so. This is not the first time this has happened.

“Initial enforcement orders are an integral part of our mergers toolkit and ensure the CMA is able to take effective action if we find competition concerns.

“Breaches like this one threaten our ability to maintain the benefits of competition for people using these products and services.”

In response, a Meta spokesperson said: “We are disappointed by the CMA’s decision to fine us because of the voluntary departure of US-based employees.

“We intend to pay the fine, but it is problematic that the CMA can take decisions that could directly impact the rights of our US employees protected under US law.”

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in