MPs warned against rush to rewrite Commons rule book

The Commons is to stage a three-hour emergency debate on standards following the row over Owen Paterson.
The Houses of Parliament (Tim Ireland/PA)
PA Wire
Gavin Cordon8 November 2021

MPs have been warned not to rush into changing Westminster’s disciplinary procedures in the wake of the row over Owen Paterson

The Commons is staging a three-hour emergency debate after the dramatic collapse last week of the Government’s attempt to overhaul the system amid bitter recriminations.

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer has called on Boris Johnson to apologise to the nation as renewed charges of Tory “sleaze” threatened to engulf his administration.

Ministers were accused of seeking to rewrite the rule book after Mr Paterson – a Conservative former Cabinet minister – was found to have repeatedly lobbied ministers and officials on behalf of two companies he worked for as a paid consultant.

Owen Paterson quit as MP for North Shropshire (Victoria Jones/PA)
PA Wire

The attempt failed after opposition parties refused to co-operate, while Mr Paterson announced he was quitting as MP for North Shropshire blaming the “cruel world of politics”.

He has insisted throughout that he did nothing wrong.

While ministers have acknowledged it was a mistake to conflate his case with efforts to change the system, they argue that there is still a need for reform.

In particular they have pointed to concern among some MPs about the need for a more robust system of appeals when they are found to have breached the rules.

However Chris Bryant the Labour MP who chairs the cross-party Commons Standards Committee which found Mr Paterson guilty of an “egregious” breach of the ban on paid lobbying by MPs, cautioned against a rush to change.

He said Mr Paterson had had a “very fair hearing” by the independent Commissioner for Standards Kathryn Stone and had been found “bang to rights”.

Mr Bryant said the Government should not become involved in Commons disciplinary procedures which were a matter for MPs.

Chris Bryant has warned against a rush to change the Commons rules (Lewis Whyld/PA)
PA Archive

“I don’t think we should leap into making sudden changes. One of my principles is that the Government should stay clear of independent disciplinary processes,” he told Sky News.

“We agreed that he (Mr Paterson) had broken the rules, not just once but on 14 occasions, and it saddened me that the Government got this completely and utterly wrong.”

However a Tory member of the committee, Alberto Costa, said that change was needed and that MPs should not be sitting in judgment on other MPs.

He said the findings of the standards commissioner should go to an independent expert panel, including members of the judiciary, to consider what action to take.

“I don’t think MPs should be adjudicating on issues against other MPs. Let the commissioner present her face to judges and let them be the ultimate arbiters,” he told Sky News.

“We need to change the rules, make it more transparent, bring in members of the judiciary.”

Meanwhile International Trade Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan indicated Mr Johnson would not be in the Commons for the debate and that the Leader of the House Jacob Rees-Mogg would lead for the Government.

“My opinion would be that no, he shouldn’t be there,” she told Sky News.

“He will no doubt – as we all do – have the House of Commons on in his office as he’s dealing with many, many other issues that only a Prime Minister can deal with.

“He will get a briefing of the key issues raised by colleagues from across the House later on, I believe that the Leader and other ministers will be well placed to take the despatch box this afternoon.”

The Liberal Democrats, who secured the emergency debate, said it would be a “shocking failure of leadership” if Mr Johnson failed to appear.

Chief whip Wendy Chamberlain said: “A fish rots from the head down, and it’s the same with Boris Johnson’s corrupt and sleazy Government.

“From the redecoration of his flat to holidays reportedly paid for by Tory Party donors, the Prime Minister has serious questions to answer about his own integrity and allegations he has breached parliamentary standards.

“It looks very much like Boris Johnson was trying to use Owen Paterson’s case to get himself off the hook, which would be a new low even by his standards.”

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in