Pensioner lost £193k to other Barclays customer after getting sort code wrong

Peter Teich was forced to wage a court battle over the money.
PA
Rebecca Speare-Cole7 December 2019

A pensioner was forced to wage a court battle for his £193,000 inheritance after it was transferred to another bank customer by mistake.

Peter Teich, 74, from Cambridge, was due to receive the money in April following the death of his father.

But after mistakenly providing his solicitor with the wrong sort code, the inheritance was transferred to the account of another Barclays bank customer in the Cambridge area who refused to return it.

Mr Teich, who is deaf, said his solicitor contacted Barclays and was initially told it would take a week for the money to be returned.

But in May, he claims he received a letter from the bank which stated he had been "mis-advised" about the funds being restored.

Peter Teich and his wife Veronica Becko from Cambridge
PA

Instead, the bank said it had credited his account with a "small token gesture" of £25, Mr Teich claimed.

His wife Veronica Becko, 75, said: "We just felt numb. It didn't seem possible or right that a big bank like Barclays could not sort this out. It was an obvious mistake.

"They [Barclays] didn't seem sorry about it. They kept saying it was our fault and there was nothing they could do."

Mr Teich, who previously worked in the building industry and charity sectors, only realised the error after his sister emailed him on April 26 - the day of the transfer - to say she had received her £193,000 share.

He had given his correct name, address and Barclays account number in Cambridge to his solicitor, but the last two digits of his sort code were incorrect, Ms Becko said.

Mr Teich hired lawyers and, after spending £12,000 in legal and court fees, obtained the other Barclays customer's name in June.

He then had to spend a further £34,000 to obtain a court injunction to force the other Barclays customer to pay, and in July the inheritance was finally paid into his account.

However, when he asked the bank to repay his £46,000 in legal fees, he claims Barclays refused.

Mr Teich said in a statement: "I freely acknowledge my mistake in this unhappy saga.

"I provided the sort code of the wrong Barclays branch. But my error fades into near insignificance when considered in the context of Barclays' conduct."

Ms Becko said it was only after they contacted The Guardian newspaper that the bank agreed to pay the fees and offer a further £750 for their inconvenience.

"Barclays has done the right thing, finally, although through a rather long-winded way," Ms Becko said.

"We hope our story will help other people who find themselves in a similar situation."

In a statement, Barclays said: "It is evident that on this occasion we have failed to meet the high standards that Mr Teich can expect to receive from Barclays, and for this we have offered our sincere apologies.

"After taking a closer look at this situation, we can confirm that Mr Teich can expect the fees he has incurred to be refunded in full with interest, together with a payment for the distress and inconvenience this matter has caused."

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in