Appeal over Bali Briton's funding

1/2
21 April 2013

Lawyers for British grandmother Lindsay Sandiford go to the Court of Appeal in London on Monday over a UK Government refusal to fund her appeal against a death sentence imposed by an Indonesian court after she was found guilty of drug smuggling.

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office said it would not pay for "an adequate lawyer" to represent Sandiford, 56, from Cheltenham. She was sentenced to death by firing squad by a court in Bali for taking £1.6 million of cocaine on to the island.

Earlier this month Sandiford, originally from Redcar, Teesside, lost the first appeal to the Bali High Court but is expected to take her case to Indonesia's Supreme Court.

At the end of January, UK High Court judges upheld the Government refusal to fund her, despite pleas that she was urgently in need of money and her family had exhausted all their available resources.

Mrs Justice Gloster, sitting with Mrs Justice Nicola Davies, said the court understood "the deep concerns of Mrs Sandiford and her family about Mrs Sandiford's predicament" but her case must be dismissed. Sandiford received the death sentence, despite prosecutors asking only for a 15-year jail term, after being accused of damaging the image of Bali

The British Government said it was disappointed when she lost her bid to block the sentence. The FCO reiterated the UK's opposition to the death penalty and said it had repeatedly made representations to the Indonesian government about the case.

Balinese police said Sandiford was at the centre of a drugs-importing ring involving three other Britons, but she said she was forced to transport the drugs to protect her children whose safety was at stake.

In the UK High Court, her QC Aidan O'Neill said the refusal to offer her funding breached her "fundamental rights".

Martin Chamberlain, appearing for the FCO, argued it was neither unfair nor irrational for the Foreign Secretary to refuse. He said said it would be difficult to set up a funding scheme for citizens in trouble overseas and limit it to death sentence cases.

There would be pressure to extend such a scheme to other human rights cases where sentences offended "human dignity", such as cases where British nationals might be sentenced to 30 lashes because they are gay in some countries, or a woman might be sentenced for driving a car. The Foreign Secretary was entitled to conclude such a move would not be "wise or sensible", he said.

https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/foreign-commonwealth-office(Foreign and Commonwealth Office )

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in