BBC to review SPOTY shortlisting

BBC Sports Personality of the Year
12 April 2012

The BBC are to review the shortlisting process for next year's Sports Personality of the Year show after no women made it on to the shortlist for this year's event.

The announcement of the all-male 2011 shortlist provoked a storm of criticism with world champions such as swimmers Rebecca Adlington and Keri-Anne Payne excluded.

The BBC say they are standing by the current voting process but will review it for next year, saying in a statement: "We stand by the current voting process but have committed to take on board what has happened this year and we will review the shortlisting process for next year's show."

The statement continued: "It is too early to say what, if any changes will be made to the process but please rest assured that we will seek the opinions of people both within and outside of the BBC before deciding on the appropriate methodology for 2012.

The shortlist was compiled by a panel of 27 sports editors from national and regional newspapers and magazines - including lads mags Zoo and Nuts - each of whom voted for 10 names. The BBC say they are convinced the system is fair.

The statement added: "The current system was introduced in 2006 and at least two women have always previously been shortlisted for the main award. Having considered a wide range of alternative mechanisms, we remain convinced that the current system is fair, independent and robust.

"This is therefore the first time there has been no female representation since the current system was put in place five years ago. The ultimate winner of the award is determined solely by a public telephone vote during the show itself."

Adlington, Payne and taekwondo world champion Sarah Stevenson are among those to have criticised the shortlist.

Four MPs, Stella Creasy, Alison McGovern, Jo Swinson and Joan Walley, wrote to BBC director general Mark Thompson on Wednesday to complain about the absence of women on the shortlist.

The letter requested a meeting and asked: "Can you explain the reasoning behind the inclusion of the men's magazines 'Nuts' and 'Zoo' in the nomination process, but the exclusion of equivalent women's or sports magazines?"

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in