Surrey slam ‘ludicrous’ claims over Ashes ball change after Australia complaints

Press Association6 August 2023

Surrey have rejected the “ludicrous” claim that an old Dukes ball could have been used in the final Ashes Test at the Kia Oval.

England were able to win the fifth Test by 49 runs to level the series at 2-2 but the Australian press coverage in the immediate days after last Monday's dramatic finale was dominated by ‘ballgate’ with Usman Khawaja among a number of current and former players to discuss the subject.

Khawaja and fellow opener David Warner were well set on day four in an unbroken century stand when the former was struck on the helmet by a bouncer, which resulted in a change to the Dukes ball being used.

Dilip Jajodia, the owner of Dukes Cricket Balls, has vowed to launch an investigation after he added to speculation that a ball from a previous batch could have been used, not a ball from the 2023 batch.

A Surrey spokesperson told the PA news agency: “Mr Jajodia is correct to say that Duke's balls are supplied to the Oval and to Surrey CCC ahead of the season for use in matches and training. These balls can also be used as match replacements, as seen during the Test.

“There were a wide selection of balls available to the umpire's at all times, with a variety of conditions to choose from, and that decision is entirely at their discretion.

“We reject entirely the assertion that a ball from 2018 or 2019 could have been available for selection and think the suggestion itself is ludicrous.”

Jajodia, in an interview with News Corp, explained how every ball produced for a specific season has the date stamped on it and while “it's not likely”, he admitted a ball from a different year could have been behind the changed ball on day four, producing more swing and seam movement.

“I can't imagine they would risk putting a ball in there with a different date on it. Frankly, the match referee should be on top of it," Jajodia said of Surrey, via Wisden.com.

“We do bang that number in quite hard, so even if the gold comes off, the ball is imprinted. It wouldn't be easy to get rid of it. I'm not saying it's impossible (that it was a 2018 or 2019 ball), but it's not likely.

“I'm going to investigate myself because it affects me. My name is at stake so it's important they don't misallege something was wrong with the ball.”

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in